By Paul Rodgers

Most creatures that use sound do so for communication, to find a mate, warn off rivals or warn of predators. Bats, and a few other creatures, such as cetaceans, use it differently. Their calls are designed to locate obstacles, prey and each other in space. Or so scientists thought.

Bats can, it turns out, distinguish between calls made by members of their own species and others, even those that are closely related and inhabit similar ecological niches, according to research by scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology (previously part of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society, which was renamed in honour of the quantum physicist after the Second World War).

Horseshoe bats can hear foreign accents.

Bats living in similar environments tend to use similar echolocation calls to orient themselves and search for food. But in a paper in this month’s American Naturalist, Maike Schuchmann and Bjorn Siemers at the institute’s facility in Seewiesen, Austria, were able to prove that echolocation calls carry more information than assumed.

Horseshoe bat species in Bulgaria were used for the behavioural experiments, in which scientists played the calls of three different species through ultrasonic speakers and analysed the animal’s responses. Both the Bulgarian bat species showed signs of being able to distinguish the calls, although the effect was clearer with calls that were in a clearly separate frequency band from their own.

Siemers reasoned that it would be advantageous for bats to get out of the way of competitively superior species in hunting grounds. And if the other species roosted in similar roosting requirements, identifying them could help the bats find new shelters. The institute’s scientists hope to do follow-up experiments to see whether either of these hypotheses explains the new-found ability.

By Paul Rodgers

If it were up to me, magic would work. Much of my teens were spent in an imaginary land full of elves and dwarves, steeped in the lore of Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings and games such as Dungeons & Dragons. Who could resist the idea that waving a wand or drinking a potion could solve life’s problems?

As an adult, though, I found that magic doesn’t work, and science does. Yet the NHS, an institution that should be a bastion of science, continues to spend millions of pounds a year – for remedies, staff and the upkeep of four specialist hospitals – on homeopathy, a practice with no scientific basis whose origins lie in Renaissance alchemy. At best, homeopathy is an expensive placebo, but in leaching scarce resources from treatments that are effective, and by distracting patients from seeking proper medical care, it causes real harm. That kind-hearted Britons are being encouraged to give money to pay for a group of homeopaths to go to Haiti to treat earthquake victims is scandalous.

Let’s be clear. Homeopathy is not the same as herbalism, which has some scientific merit. Its main principle, that “like-cures-like”, dates back to Paracelsus, a 16th century physician, astrologer and occultist who believed that if you suffered from, say, stomach cramps, the cure should be something that causes stomach cramps. The problem – obviously, you might think – was that this “cure” often made things worse. Two centuries later, Samuel Hahnemann, a German physician, realised that diluting the like-cures-like medicines reduced their toxic effects, though not, he claimed paradoxically, their efficacy.

And so homeopathy was born. Minute doses of the active ingredients are diluted so much that your chance of finding even one atom of it in your pricey sugar pills could be as low as one in a trillion. Exotic explanations for this vary widely, often involving the sort of pseudoscientific gobbledygook that is the stock in trade for Star Trek scriptwriters. One common idea is that water can “remember” which active ingredient used to be present (though apparently it forgets the myriad other contaminants that have been removed). As David Colquhoun, a professor of pharmacology at University College London, put it: “If homeopathy worked, the whole of chemistry and physics would have to be overturned”. Even some of the purveyors of these snake oils don’t have much faith in them. Paul Bennett, the professional standards director at Boots, one of the country’s biggest homeopathic retailers, admitted in November that “I have no evidence before me to suggest that they are efficacious.”

The Commons Science and Technology Select Committee – which reported on 22 February on its investigation into this “alternative therapy” – concluded that public funding for this hocus pocus should be cut. Even research into it should be abandoned as a waste of money. The MPs should go further. Homeopaths should be held legally responsible if they prescribe their placebos for conditions which demand proper medical attention. In Australia, two homeopaths, husband and wife, were jailed last autumn for gross criminal negligence over the death of their nine-month-old baby in 2002. The baby had severe eczema and died of septicaemia after her parents tried to treat her homeopathically. Even the placebo effect doesn’t work on babies.

Homeopaths will counter that they have several centuries worth of experience during which they’ve given their tonics to patients who have subsequently recovered. The flaw here is clear. Just because a treatment precedes a recovery does not mean it caused the recovery. Often patients seek help when their symptoms are worst, when the only way they could change is to get better. The argument that, in a free country, people should be allowed to choose what therapies they take is stronger, but only if patients are told the facts about those nostrums. And once they know that they’re getting a placebo, its effectiveness will mostly crumble. It has also been suggested that homeopathy helps GPs divert chronic time-wasters. Convenient, perhaps, but dishonest; like magic potions, lies have no place in a doctor’s black bag.

by Joseph Milton

A polyp: a pre-cancerous growth in the bowel

A one-off five-minute procedure reduces deaths from bowel cancer by 43 per cent and decreases the incidence of the disease by a third.

If introduced nationally, it would save at least 3,000 lives every year, and save the National Health Service £28 for every person screened by removing the need for treatment, according to a study published in the Lancet.

Listen to Joseph Milton’s audio report below.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X

By Hannah King

Ethiopia has become the most recent African nation to announce the arrival of its very own science academy, located in the capital Addis Ababa and backed by the UK’s Royal Society. But there are fears that centres elsewhere have so far failed to deliver.

Ethiopia has become the most recent African nation to announce the arrival of its very own science academy

The past few years have seen the arrival of a number of science centres across the African continent as political interest in science has grown. Demisse Habte, former World Bank health specialist and president of Ethiopia’s new academy said: “There is a much better appreciation in the government for the role science can play in development.” Other academies set up recently include one in Zambia in 2005, Mauritius in 2007 and Mozambique in 2009, with more planned. The next opening is expected to be in Namibia.

But few of Africa’s new academies have so far achieved what they set out to. Mohamed Hassan, executive director of the Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS) said: “It’s been a very slow process, and a little bit disappointing.” He explained that in Tanzania for example, the academy has been in existence for four to five years and has still not matured. “It has only about 25 members, most of whom are old men. They are not moving.”

According to Hassan, there are two main problems with Africa’s emerging academies. The first is that they lack leadership, a dedicated figurehead to drive them forward, and the second is a failure to connect with and inspire the next generation of young scientists.

As for the centre in Addis Ababa, it has not yet been approved by parliament and as such its future funding structure remains uncertain.

By Smitha Mundasad

A British baby is the first newborn in the world to receive xenon gas treatment, in an attempt to reduce the chances of brain injury.

Over 1,000 babies born at full term each year are at risk of suffering from brain injuries or death as the result of a lack of oxygen or blood supply at birth.

Baby Riley was born with no spontaneous respiratory effort. In need of urgent resuscitation, he was given the rare xenon gas at St Michael’s Hospital in Bristol by Prof. Marianne Thoresen.

An illustration of Xenon gas being given to a child

In combination with a cooling treatment, Thoresen believes that this could prevent brain injuries that are associated with conditions such as cerebral palsy.

The treatment has been developed over a number of years by Thoresen of the University of Bristol and John Dingley of Swansea University.

“In 2002, John Dingley and I realised the potential xenon and cooling might have in combination to further reduce disability,” said Thoresen.

The team has shown that in laboratory studies xenon gas adds to the protective effect of cooling on the brain.

“However we faced the challenge of how to successfully deliver this rare and extremely expensive gas to newborn babies,” continued Thoresen.

This was solved by the use of a machine invented by Dingley, who has also developed equipment to allow the use of xenon gas for adult anaesthesia.

Dingley said: “A key design feature of this machine is that it is very efficient, using less than 200ml of xenon per hour – less than the volume of a soft drink can. As even newborns breathe many litres of air per hour, any xenon-based treatment would be impossibly expensive without an economical delivery method.”

The gas has been authorised for use in a clinical trial, funded by the children’s medical research charity Sparks, and will be given to at least 12 babies over the coming months. If this feasibility trial is completed successfully, it is hoped that the gas will become available on a wider scale.

By Nan King

Four members of the Elements team were selected by the EU funded project ‘RELATE‘ to go and report from research centres across Europe. Nan was sent for a week at the Von Karman Institute in Brussels and sent us this report.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Nan prepares to view the plasmatron in action.

By Tiffany Stecker

Former science ministers from Labour and Conservative parties have put aside political differences to urge the incoming Government to support science funding.

Lord David Sainsbury, who served as science minister under PM Tony Blair’s Labour Government, and Tory Lord William Waldegrave, who worked under PM Margaret Thatcher, made the joint announcement at the launch of a Royal Society report on the importance of innovation.

Investment in science is needed

The two former ministers sat on the advisory group of the Royal Society that released the publication. The group began working on the report last April.

“Times are tough at the moment but that is exactly when you need to invest in the future and focus spending where you already have an advantage. Investment in science cannot be turned on and off on a political whim - we must have a long-term investment,” Lord Waldegrave said.

The report was written as a response to increased spending in R&D abroad. The US pledged $21 billion to boost science last year. In France, €35 billion has been invested for the “knowledge economy,” and China has given almost 25 per cent to R&D investment, year on year.

“We cannot compete with countries such as China and India on the basis of low wages,” Lord Sainsbury said. “Science and innovation must, therefore, be the basis of the strategy for growth,” he added.

Titled “The Scientific Century: Securing our Future Prosperity,” it identified six recommendations for future science policy: to recognise science as a crucial element for economic growth; to invest in doctoral studies and research councils; to increase resources within Government business and science departments; to place the UK as a centre for international science research and exchanges; to align scientific research with public and commercial needs; and to bring new life into science and maths education.

According to the report, the UK currently contributes to 3 per cent of global funding for research and to almost 8 per cent of scientific research papers in the world.

By Ian Randall

Diamonds could be your computer’s best friend

Scientists have created a diamond nanowire that emits single photons, Nature Nanotechnology reported this week. Harvard University , the University of Munich and Texas A&M teamed up to use impurities within the crystal to generate light.

Lead researcher, Marko Loncar, said: “The diamond nanowire device acts as a nanoscale antenna that funnels the emission of single photons from the embedded colour center into a microscope lens.”

It is possible that, in the future, this technology might be applicable to the further development of fiber-optics in the fields of communication and computing.


Warming seas are melting Greenland glaciers

The ocean waters that melt ice in fjords significantly affect the stability of the edges of the Greenland ice sheet, Nature Geoscience reported this week. The research also showed that the submarine melting of glaciers can produce ice loss in the same order of magnitude as the breaking-off of icebergs.

“The studies by Straneo and Rignot and their colleagues are vital steps towards an understanding of Greenland’s ice loss into fjords,” commented Paul Holland, of the British Antarctic Survey.

The researchers carried out oceanographic studies of the fjord in which the sea meets the Helheim Glacier – where there is a notable interchange between the waters of the fjord and subtropical waters on the shelf.


Got milk?

Small herds of cows which are tied into stalls produce more milk than their counterparts that are allowed to roam free, it was announced this week. Researchers from the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science studied 812 herds of Norwegian Red Cattle in both tie- and free-stalls.

Lead author, Egil Simensen, said: “Free-stall cows in smaller herds produced significantly less milk than those in tie-stalls, but more milk in larger herds.”

The study, printed in the journal Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, also showed that free-stall cattle are less susceptible to metabolic disease and have higher levels of reproductive success. This study follows a ban on the manufacture of new tie-stalls in Norway in 2004.

US scientists create universal afterbirth

Colliding gold ions, travelling near the speed of light, have created a liquid which is 250,000 times hotter than the Sun, reported Physical Review Letters this week. The material, a flowing mix of the subatomic particles quarks and gluons, was generated at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York.

Dr. William F. Brinkman, Director of the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, said: “This research offers significant insight into the fundamental structure of matter and the early universe, highlighting the merits of long-term investment in large-scale, basic research programs at our national laboratories.”

A 2.4 mile-circumference Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider was used to create the quark-gluon plasma – the same substance believed to have existed microseconds after the Big Bang, from which all other mater was formed.