Aleksey Gurkin

Journalism training in Kyrgyzstan is entirely based on Russian universities’ programmes and is outdated both in content and technically, said Aleksey Gurkin, chair of journalism and mass communications department at the American University in Central Asia (AUCA).

“In most cases the curriculum that is being used here is largely based on the curriculum being used in Russian universities. In the best scenario it will be the Moscow State University, and in the worst one of those peripheral universities in Russia. The problem is that the Russian style of journalism is very specific. And the people who develop curriculums are those who are followers of this specific model of journalism,” said Gurkin. “A lot of materials and the way of teaching itself are outdated, because substantial resources are required to update the programmes continuously. And in our case we don’t have even our own learning materials”.

The main problem with using the Russian curriculum and learning materials is that nobody tries to adapt them to local needs and even understand what is really needed. “We basically take Russian programmes and transplant them here, which is not always the best option. The best practices come from other countries and in this case it is Russia; however they need to be adapted to local needs and this is something that is missing. It plays a negative role in terms of how in tune we are with contemporary developments in the media world,” added Gurkin.

According to Gurkin, Kyrgyz journalism still contains a lot of details borrowed from the Soviet school of journalism because it mostly copies the Russian way of doing journalism. “It is not appropriate at all. We are lagging behind current tendencies of journalism”.

In AUCA teachers use an interdisciplinary approach; however they have to struggle with the Kyrgyz Ministry of Education which condemns them for not complying with state standards. As AUCA uses an American style of teaching journalism as opposed to state standards based on a Russian one, there is a reason for conflict.

“We believe we are preparing students who are more adaptable to a modern media environment and a modern journalism profession”, said Gurkin.

Lack of technical resources is another problem which affects the journalism teaching process. If, for example, students are interested in broadcast journalism they often have no opportunity to practice gained skills using modern video, editing or sound equipment. “They often end up applying for jobs in the local TV channels and start to use equipment they have just seen for the first time in their lives,” added Gurkin.

The lack of younger professionals also is a big issue for journalism departments in Kyrgyzstan. In the Kyrgyz National University, most of the teachers used to be journalists in the Soviet Times, more than 20 years ago. It affects enormously the quality of education, according to Gurkin.

“When something happens in Kyrgyzstan foreign journalists come here and do things themselves rather than working with local journalists or commissioning to them to produce something. That is not because most of them don’t speak English or that some of them cannot produce material up to standard to be published by the foreign media. It is because they simply have no contacts abroad and are very local-oriented,” said Gurkin.

Aleksey Gurkin also said how prestigious and popular among potential students the journalism profession is. If you are interested please listen to his short interview below.

Aleksey Gurkin audio

By Grace Howe

Natural historian and filmmaker Keith Scholey is producing three full length wildlife documentaries that will examine the behaviour of cheetahs, tigers, and lions in their natural habitat.

The first film, due for release in America this autumn, is entitled ‘Big Cats’. Five years in the making, it was made primarily using the new Sony F23 camera, which is discreet and advanced enough to cause minimal interference in any animal’s environment. The camera can be left for days in the wild without needing attendance or interruption from human hands.

This technology provided a unique opportunity for capturing animals in a gathered community. The film is an attempt to view these creatures in an entirely new way, by allowing their natural behaviour and interaction with each other to create a storyline and give phrasing and drama to the piece, with little influence or explanatory commentary from the BBC editing team.

Cheetah with impala kill

I spoke to Keith, co-producer of the Blue Planet and Planet Earth series, about the idea behind this new film and how the production has developed since the final rushes were gathered.

“Keith, What inspired you to become a filmmaker instead of sticking to science on paper? You began this journey with a biology degree!”

“In a rather geek-ish way, the subject just obsessed me, I wanted everyone to be interested in what I was interested in, and excited by the same sights. During travelling and in my first jobs in wildlife documentary, I felt enormously privileged to view what I had done and intrigued by the possibilities of sharing it.”

“In this film, you have attempted to capture the essence of how the Masai-Mara lions and cheetahs interact with each other. It is based in Kenya, and offers a view a to how these big cats live and function in their own life journey, and to create a feature film instead of an ‘informative documentary’ Why did you decide to film with this new objective?”

“We wanted to show these beautiful animals in an entirely new way. It is an attempt to explore how they live and communicate. That animals are aware of their life and their own life span is left to the side of most documentary explanation. This film is shot over two generations of each species, so there is the family line to follow.

I wanted to show that cats are aware, as we are, of preference, sadness, meanness, and character. The looks, the mood-changes, the treatment they give each other and the way they strive to survive. After four years of observation we realised that what we were seeing was moving, in a new way, a story of life as well as wild scene. I wanted to communicate that.”

“Films that create an affinity with animals can help to ensure that we prioritise conserving them. Did you have this objective in mind when you made the film?”

“No! We want to take the viewers completely away from themselves. We will not have a voice-over commentary as yet, and we are undecided on where to put necessary explanation, but it is not about human intelligence. What we learnt from it was the clear and gruesome methods of survival. The ruthlessness, determination, affection, love, fear. That is how we found the story line, in the interaction, the strong and weak characters and how they live together.

Particularly fascinating to me was how the female cheetahs are driven to protect their young and fend for themselves in the treacherous environment with the lions. In other parts as with the blue whale young in Blue Planet, we see how and when the mother is driven to desert her young in her own effort to survive - how long it takes them to let the cub go. The film also compares the two challenges of living and breeding within a gang, and living as a solitary parent.”

“The things we expect to divide us from animals, the consciousness that they supposedly don’t have, the decision-making, liking and dislike, love and hatred, exists within any community.”

“All wildlife explanation is best when it increases compassion for animals. In many ways this film can teach human beings, not about their own lives or mind, but how most of what they do and respond to depends on survival and instinct, rather than intelligence. That is what I hope to achieve! We want to show that any animal community contains just as much of the complexities of human nature that we credit as being part of intellect and thought, and the human brain. Our study I believe showed similarities with the human relationships we form and the affiliations we value.”

“Since the earliest natural history documentary films, it has been very influential to include the human touch in some way, with music, commentary, or explanation. Natural scientists such as David Attenborough have set the example of always communicating not just the landscape, the place, the atmosphere, but their own affinity with the animals, which in turn moved people to understand the environment better and to understand animal similarities. Now you are moving away from this as a production team, what will be the biggest hurdle to promoting your film?”

“We specifically aim to reach audiences that would never dream of watching a documentary on television! The time constraints of people’s lives allow for entertainment to be allocated, and it must be a promise to be entertainment, and a break from the routine. We hope that for America in particular they will respond brilliantly to something presented as a full story, with a storyline, and the Disney sponsorship ensures the kind of publicity environmental issues need if we hope to help our wildlife and planet. We had to say yes! I hope it will mean that the next generation get involved in animal conservation as we are.”

‘Big Cats’ will be release across America in September of this year.

By Smitha Peter

Additives are used to improve the appearance and odour of processed food items. They also enhance shelf lives. Such additives include acids, antioxidants, flavour enhancers, preservatives and sweeteners. Their use has significantly increased alongside the popularity of processed produce in the past two centuries.

Food additives are often used to improve the taste and appearence of processed foods. Image credit: Valerio Capello

There has been significant controversy associated with the risk and benefits of additives. In this piece, Prof. Martin Caraher, of City University London’s Centre for Food Policy, express his views about food additives.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

By Christine Ottery

Climate science has shown in the past six months that – and sorry if this is a climate change cliché – things are worse than we thought. According to the most up-to-date science, Clive Hamilton, author of Requiem for a Species: Why we resist the truth about climate change says that we are likely to see warming of 4 degrees by 2070 or 2080. Despite this, some recent climate change studies have not made a much of a splash, obfuscated in a fug of Climategate. Hamilton thinks there has been a campaign against climate scientists. You can read more about this in an extract of his book here.

Professor Clive Hamilton

Hamilton also examines the yawning gap between the public perception of climate change and the science. Why do people’s beliefs, and therefore actions, stray from the facts? At a talk at the RSA, Hamilton states that people fall into three groups: those that don’t accept manmade climate change, including denialists; those with maladaptive strategies, who accept the facts but can act as if they don’t exist; or people who are adaptive and behave in line with reality. Hamilton says most of us are maladaptive, so there are real question marks over how we are going to face the challenges of climate change.

I caught up with Hamilton after the debate to continue the discussion of how to get people to act on climate change.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[Credit: www.freesound.org/eraylik for Protest_Zara_Day, mw_1984 for rallyclap2, dobroide for 20070210.helicopter, medialint for Iraq_War_Demonstration_SanFrancisco, osivo for newspaper and ERH for by any means]

By Christine Ottery

Barefoot running a new trend in fitness. But is it actually better for you than running in traditional padded trainers? I spoke to some experts, including podiatrist Justin Coulter and sports scientist Lee Saxby to find out – once I’d got my breath back from trying barefoot-style running for myself.

Is it better for us to walk and run barefoot?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

For more information see my feature on The Ecologist website.

By Achintya Rao

India sent a team of students to the International Sustainable World (Energy, Engineering and Environment) Project [I-SWEEEP] Olympiad for the first time this year. The Olympiad was held between 14 April and 19 April this year. I spoke to Dr Arnab Bhattacharya, co-chair of the IRIS Scientific Review Committee that selects and guides the students, to ask him about the experience.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

I-SWEEEP

Image Credit: I-SWEEEP

By Julius Goldthorpe and Jennifer Green

The possible expansion of Heathrow airport has led to worries concerning the environmental, social and political impact it would have in the UK. Arguments put forward for and against the proposed expansion have made this topic one of the most hotly debated in years.

Although a third runway at Heathrow may seem less likely since the Conservatives formed a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats, there is still a strong possibility that, in the not too distant future, the debate will resurface.

We were lucky enough to speak to John Stewart, chair of HACAN ClearSkies, regarding pollution, biofuels and the third runway.

By Gulnura Toralieva

An unstable political situation caused by two revolutions, one of which took place in 2005 and the other one just several weeks ago is one of the reasons why environment is not on the agenda.

The social and economic conditions of the people are the main topics covered by journalists. They are reluctant to cover environmental issues because the people living in extreme poverty cannot think about the environment, said Marat Tokoev, chairman of the Public Association Journalists (PAJ), a union for journalists.

Marat Tokoev

Because of small staff numbers and scanty earnings, journalists concentrate on producing analytical materials, news, and comments on all the topics without any limitations. This usually affects the quality of journalistic output, Tokoev added.

“There are two different types of environmental reporters: One of them doesn’t have a deep knowledge of the environment and the other one does but does not have the necessary journalistic skills for good reporting,” he said.

Kyrgyz journalists have a very narrow conception of what to report on. Most of the material is about pollution of Issyk Kul lake, toxic waste and domestic waste. Few of them write about global warming and land degradation.
“Poor quality of journalistic education became the talk of the town. There are no steps to improve it. Few journalism graduates want to pursue a career as a journalist. Those who came to the real world of journalism are retrained. Why should we discuss the environmental reporting that requires more specific knowledge, when journalists can not elementarily formulate their thoughts?” said Tokoev.

According to Tokoev, this occurred because the journalism schools still train students under the Soviet system, which is more theoretical than practical. Old standards do not stress the need for internships. Another problem is the absence of professional experience among professors who are mostly historians, linguists or people with a more cultural background. They never practice journalism themselves. There are about 20 universities in the country that train future journalists, but only two of them manage to do it in a proper way.

“Kyrgyz authorities think they will not benefit if journalists will report on environmental issues too. It will make people excited and angry that so many problems are not resolved and may affect their lives. The government has no money to mitigate environmental hazards and doesn’t want the people to know about them. That is why there is a big problem for journalists to get access to necessary information. There are hidden efforts not to let materials on environment appear in the media. Mass media is often intimidated not to publish materials on environment,” said Tokoev.

By Gulnura Toralieva

There is no environmental journalism in Kyrgyzstan, said Almaz Ismanov, an independent journalist based in the Kyrgyz town of Osh in the south of the country. According to him, there are only occasional publications about environment, which usually occur within contests or “green” projects funded by international donors.

In Kyrgyzstan, political journalism is a priority. The remaining areas of journalism- including environmental, business reporting and reporting on social issues- are not popular, said Ismanov. The reason is that only political coverage, according to most newspaper editors, makes their newspaper popular amongst the people. Environmental reporting does not promote better sales of newspapers because it is not interesting for the readers. It is only interesting when some ecological disaster happens, he added.

Almaz Ismanov

The second reason is that Kyrgyz society and authorities are certain that there are no serious environmental challenges in the country.

“In Kyrgyzstan, we think we live in a paradise, where environment is not an issue at all. This idea is supported with the promotion of different tourism projects. Nobody really cares about the environment,” Ismanov said.

The lack of access to information and experts on environment, as well as the loose or nonexistant ties between journalists and not-for-profit organisations, are also problems.

There is also the problem of the unwillingness of editors to include the environmental coverage to their editorial agenda. “In my experience, there was a case when I was preparing an article about genetically modified foods and was not able to find the necessary information,” said Ismanov.

To promote better coverage of the environment, there is a need for large-scale information campaigns to attract the attention of journalists and the general public to environmental problems. It is also important to extensively train journalists.

One of the biggest obstacles is funding. “Once I wanted to conduct a serious investigation on uranium waste, but didn’t find the financial support to allow myself to focus on it without doing other jobs. So I only did a few interviews. Unfortunately, media owners today are not ready to sponsor investigative projects on environmental issues.

Environmental issues are closely intertwined with political ones. This means that without the permission of authorities, it is very difficult to cover the problems.

“For example in Naryn and Jalal-Abad regions of the country, Chinese mining companies destroy local ecosystems. But because of the lack of access to information and restrictions on publishing, it is not possible to cover the issue. The situation is the same with nature reserves. Nobody knows about them.”

By Gulnura Toralieva

Environmental journalism in Kyrgystan is being held back by a lack of knowledge amongst the writers themselves, according to a leading Kyrgyz environmentalist.

Indira Zhakipova, co-ordinator of EKOIS (the Kyrgyz network of environmental non-governmental organisations and experts), described local journalists’ knowledge as ‘primitive’ and said that they were failing to build contacts with experts in the field. She added that a lack both of analysis and regular coverage of environmental issues had led to reporting that was both ‘boring’ and poorly informed.

Kyrgyzstan's Issyk Kul lake

Lack of funding is another problem. “Everyone knows about climate change now because people spent a lot of money publicising it, and international donors started to support projects. In Kyrgyzstan we have already had three seminars,” says Zhakipova. But this means international donors are setting the agenda on what should be covered by the press.

There is also a perception that social and political issues are more important. “Writers tend to prejudge what is news. A factory closing, a corruption scandal is news – while we just get used to living with the catastrophe that is our environment, but that has to change,” says Zhakipova. Intriguingly, such change could come by default. The physical danger for journalists writing about social and political issues in Kyrgystan may prompt them to focus more on writing about the environment.

And fashions change too. “I’m sure that environmental reporting will be more popular amongst journalists because it becomes more fashionable to write about. It will be also funded by donors and it is in fact safe to report on,” she said. The impetus is there from non-governmental organisations in Kyrgyzstan. They are putting an enormous amount of energy into attracting journalists’ attention towards environmental issues, but the results are often frustrating. And as Zhakipova points out, there’s no shortage of material for writers to tackle.

“First of all we should start to get people’s attention to sanitation. When I visited our provinces I was amazed how poor sanitary conditions were for people living there. I got the impression that time stopped somewhere in the 1980s, was everything so decrepit there. The main problem is lack of water”, added Zhakipova. Water, though, is just the start.

The pollution of Issyk Kul, a lake which the government plans to exploit for tourism; despoliation by the gold mining industry; climate change; toxic waste; land degradation. These are just a few items on a long list, claims Zhakipova. “The government totally ignores environmental problems, it is too busy with social and political issues, so it has no time or manpower for dealing with the environment.”