Louise Ogden

Louise studied for a BSc in Applied Mathematics and Astronomy before realising she was far better at talking about science than actually doing it. Her passion lies in astronomy and the physical sciences, but she has an interest in nearly all aspects of science and health.

[email protected]
Follow Louise on Twitter @LouiseOgden
Find Louise’s blog here www.itsallrelativity.wordpress.com

David Cameron: Will he continue to stand by his Health Minister?

The Health and Social Care Bill currently making its way through the parliamentary process has caused quite a stir in the NHS. The Secretary of State for Health, Andrew Lansley, decided that GPs know best and should therefore commission NHS resources. Although change was expected, for many working in the NHS the move to put GPs in charge of the majority of the commissioning budget has come as quite a surprise.

The reforms proposed made by Lansley have divided opinion among GPs, hospital doctors and other healthcare professionals. Most would agree that GPs will often know what is best for their patients individually, but the question is whether this understanding stretches to the needs of the many.

The concern that communication links between the proposed GP consortia and service providers will not be strong enough is one that is held by current commissioners working at Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) across the country. At present, the PCTs work closely with service providers when commissioning different treatment programmes or commodities. When the GP consortia take over this role, there will be nothing to replace the knowledge formerly provided by staff from many different healthcare backgrounds.

A further concern is the amount of money it will cost to lose the staff currently employed in the Primary Care Trusts; the commissioners being made redundant will be given severance packages before GPs take over their role. This is a considerable expense at a time when the country is somewhat strapped for cash.

The loss of staff from the PCTs risks engendering an over-stretched workforce elsewhere. GPs in the new consortia might end up being isolated from the rest of the NHS, working in roles that will require more time handling accounts and less time on the ground doing what they were trained to do – treating patients. Others are concerned that there will be a conflict of interest for GPs and they will no longer be able to act as advocates for their patients. After all, how can a GP fight for an expensive treatment for one of his or her patients, if that same GP sits on a commission determining resource allocation for the rest of the region?

The issue many NHS staff have with these changes are the speed with which they are being brought in. With hardly any pilot studies and little evidence to support the benefit of these reforms, it’s hard to know how this will turn out. Some think that if they are implemented correctly, the reforms have the potential for success, others believe that they will fail. Either way, the reforms are already being rolled out, so we’ll find out soon enough how GPs will be able to cope with these additions to their job descriptions.

Picture Courtesy of Creative Commons. Photographer Sebastian Zwez

Communication among healthcare staff will need to be strengthened

Two years ago, Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) - the bodies formed to monitor, commission and provide healthcare services to patients in each UK region - were split into two different enterprises. The first retained the name of “PCT”, but were given the role of monitoring and commissioning care only. The second took on the role of provision, often as private entities in competition with one another for contracts commissioned by the PCTs.

These latest reforms will see the removal of the PCTs altogether. They will be replaced by GP consortia - collections of GPs within a defined area, that will run and commission the healthcare in the consortia’s region.

There has been much debate of the relevance of using GPs to do the job of commissioning, which until now has been led by groups of professionals with a range of healthcare backgrounds. Their main role was to find the right provider for the varied health needs of a population. The GP consortia will be expected to take over this role as well as maintain and run the practices where they work.

Many managerial staff within different parts of the NHS feel that the long-term care of patients with complex health needs could be forgotten about. Communication links between healthcare staff working with such patients and GPs will need to be strengthened. Continue reading »

Jason Clarke and Mike Jones on top of City's Tait Building

Welcome to the latest Elements podcast. This time we’re focussing on how solar cells affect policy, as well as discussing the controversial issue of whether mental health should be treated medically. But it’s not all so serious, we also hear about the sexual behaviour of everything from bonobos to rabbits, and even what men look for in a woman. Join Louise Ogden and Richard Masters as they discover the latest and greatest on the Elements website.

Continue reading »

The end of the world as we know it?

If you think that Google is simply a search engine, think again. Whether you like it or not, Google has grown to be one of the largest companies in the world in less than a decade, and you’d be wrong to think it’s all because of search.

But even an Internet behemoth has to start somewhere. Googled: The End of the World As We Know It was the result of Ken Auletta’s attempt to spell out the transition from, as he terms it, “old media to new media”, and he used Google as his “chosen vehicle”. Although, as he points out in his acknowledgements, the company’s founders weren’t all that happy about it. Continue reading »

The Health and Social Care Bill that is currently going through parliament has brought about a lot of discussion on the future structure of the NHS. In a special report the Elements team will be delving into a number of different areas surrounding the proposed NHS reforms and the effect they will have on healthcare workers, the NHS as an organisation and, of course, attempting to find out what it might mean for patients.

As editor, I will be reporting on the effect that the reforms will have on the healthcare professionals who aren’t doctors, and whether or not they think that their jobs will be affected by the changes.

While one of the most obvious results of the NHS reforms is the creation of GP commissioning consortia, the abolition of the Primary Care Trusts will have knock-on effects elsewhere. Dentistry is one of those areas, and Beki Hill will be investigating exactly how this aspect of health care will be affected.

Partisan commentary has thrown up different claims as to the motivation for the NHS reforms: political ideology, a failing health service or suspect political donations. However, it has been said that there has been a change to the social contract at the centre of the NHS and the move to GP commissioning is simply a logical further step on the road to individualised healthcare. Jack Serle will report on the two sides of this debate.

Now GPs are being given additional tasks does the NHS reform herald a shift in morality where the ‘greater good’ comes in to play? What is the potential for this to result in a ‘tyranny of the majority’, with the rights of the individual taking second place to the benefit of the whole? Richard Masters will be looking at the ethical effect the reforms will have on how GPs do their jobs.

Abi Millar will look at the extent to which the reforms are evidence-based, or whether they’re mostly grounded in ideology. She will discuss whether empirical evidence alone would be enough to justify the changes.

Jennifer Appleton, who is currently in Australia, will be comparing the health services that are available in Australia with the NHS. She’ll be speaking to doctors working Down Under to get their views on the good and bad within the two systems.

Fareha Lasker and Debora Miranda will be finding out what the future generations of doctors think of the proposed reforms. Were any of them asked of their opinion before the British Medical Association (BMA) meeting? Will they be less likely to go into general practice as a career now that the reforms are under way?

It has been suggested (and not just by critics) that the current wave of NHS reforms will benefit private companies who will gain a firm foothold in the running of the UK’s healthcare system. But what about those companies whose business is already inextricably tied to NHS? James Brooks investigates how the pharmaceutical industry might be affected, not only by the NHS reforms, but also other measures that the coalition government has proposed, such as “value-based pricing”.

Andrew Lansley defends his proposals for GP consortia claiming that “GPs know patients best”. Although GPs agree they know the needs of individual patients many are concerned this does not translate into understanding the public health needs of whole communities. Lorna Powell will speak to doctors who work as GPs and also those who don’t to determine their views on Lansley’s plan.

Anka Lindemann and Mike Jones will reflect on whether patients trust their GPs to take on the responsibility of the health budget. Make sure you take part in our poll on the Elements homepage which Anka and Mike will incorporate into their report.

We’ll also have a number of graphics created by Elements Editor, Djuke Veldhuis, to clear up some of the confusion about how and when these reforms will take place.

 

Click here to find the results of our special report.

Thumbnail image from Wikimedia Commons by Conrad Poirier, from Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec.

Memberships

Member Button linking to the Association of British Science Writers (ABSW) - an association of science writers, journalists, broadcasters and science-based communications professionals - many of whom are available for freelance work