<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No scan, no flight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elements-science.co.uk/2010/02/08/no-scan-no-flight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elements-science.co.uk/2010/02/08/no-scan-no-flight/</link>
	<description>Latest science, technology, health and environmental news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis Jagger</title>
		<link>http://www.elements-science.co.uk/2010/02/08/no-scan-no-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Jagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elements-science.co.uk/?p=434#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Is there a way for the scans to filter out bodily detail? I don&#039;t think this level of scrutiny is necessary. Instead of making the discourse about the prevention of extant terrorism, it should be about there being no terrorism at all, and this is achieved by not demonstrating any kind of reaction, or &#039;fight&#039;. This mental leap is well beyond our current ruling powers, and furthermore would not suit them. The need for an enemy is a well-established fact. To reverse our foreign policy, relax our free speech laws and provide security that matches the realistic threat-level is but a pipe-dream, so martial law it is. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way for the scans to filter out bodily detail? I don&#39;t think this level of scrutiny is necessary. Instead of making the discourse about the prevention of extant terrorism, it should be about there being no terrorism at all, and this is achieved by not demonstrating any kind of reaction, or &#39;fight&#39;. This mental leap is well beyond our current ruling powers, and furthermore would not suit them. The need for an enemy is a well-established fact. To reverse our foreign policy, relax our free speech laws and provide security that matches the realistic threat-level is but a pipe-dream, so martial law it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Jagger</title>
		<link>http://www.elements-science.co.uk/2010/02/08/no-scan-no-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Jagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elements-science.co.uk/?p=434#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Good lord that&#039;s an unfortunate acronym</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lord that&#39;s an unfortunate acronym</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
